/* Enhanced Black + Gold */ body { background: #0A0A0A; color: #E5E5E5; } h1, h2 { color: #FFD700; font-weight: 800; } .gold-btn { background: linear-gradient(#FFD700, #E5B800); color: #000 !important; padding: 16px 36px; border-radius: 50px; font-weight: 700; text-decoration: none; display: inline-block; box-shadow: 0 4px 15px rgba(255,215,0,0.3); transition: all 0.3s ease; } .gold-btn:hover { transform: translateY(-3px); box-shadow: 0 8px 25px rgba(255,215,0,0.5); } .video-embed { background: #1F1F1F; border: 1px solid #FFD70033; border-radius: 16px; padding: 24px; margin: 32px 0; }
top of page
Search

There Is a Floor to Cost Cutting-There Is No Floor to Value Creation

Aug 4
1 min read

Sharing a thought-provoking quote today from Eliyahu Goldratt: "The problem with a cost reduction strategy is that there is a finite limit. You can only get to zero."



I find it valuable to reflect on quotes like this and apply them to my understanding, allowing them to influence my perspective. One interpretation I have is the common organizational mindset of asking, "How much cost can we take out of that?" This mindset reveals its own limitations, as the answer is "at most, all of it."



Conversely, when we ask, "How much value can we create in that process?" the ceiling disappears. A strategy focused solely on reducing costs without creating value is inherently limited.



I've often observed organizations removing value in the pursuit of cost reduction, which negatively impacts both aspects.



When faced with challenges, do we prioritize "reducing costs," or do we take the time to identify "missing value" as well?



Pick up a copy of my new book here: https://lnkd.in/g7xqPXbT



Let's strive to make tomorrow better than today.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page